|
I look gay? I don't give a damn! |
I am sure most of us regardless gay or straight have made or were told one of these remarks before, "You look gay!" or "That's so gay!". I have too, in fact it was most recently in my facebook
message. When that happened, I was wondering, how can a person tell from your
picture whether you’re gay or not especially if you’re not dressed in
androgynous clothes or decked in too many girly accessories? Or was I just too
sensitive; he might be telling me that I looked happy instead. Whoa, that’s
bullshit man! Don’t get me wrong; I was not upset about being gay or looking
like one. It’s just that it was such an irresponsible sweeping statement that
is purely based on the assessment of my picture. One good thing however was
that this incident got me thinking and questioning deeper, why such term even
existed in the first place.
Well let’s rewind back to the past. In the olden days or even
during my younger days, which was in the 70s and 80s, most gays were very
careful about divulging their secret of liking the same sex and definitely not
that opened to the society. Of course there were exceptions. There were those
who were born more effeminate and thus were more opened about their sexual
inclination through their actions such as dressing up in female clothes and
accessories. The stereotypical gay men were more obvious in their appearance or
action during those days. Most will get taunted and even bullied, as they were
not the ‘Norm’ among the society. And how about those gay men who inertly liked
men but afraid to be exposed during those days? Well, they normally hid behind
a masculine façade, participated in manly activities, pretending to like gals, probably
even had girlfriends and eventually got married.
Fast forward to the 21st century, and here we
are. Gays now are more open and proud to display their affections and likings
and pay no attention to the so-called norm of the society. Of course there are
still a huge number of men who are still afraid to come out either because of
the nature of their work, succumbing to the pressure of their peers and society
at large.
But the question is whether calling others or
making statements like “You look so gay” or “That’s so gay” still relevant and more importantly acceptable in today's society? I know that everyone is guilty
here including me of course as I remembered saying those words to others who
probably behaved more feminine or those who liked and did things that are
normally associated with the opposite sex.
Let’s dissect this a bit further. Gone were the days that
one can tell whether you’re gay or not just by looking at your physical
attributes and fashion styling. The term metrosexual was coined at the turn of
the century because straight men were appearing gayer and definitely more vain
and dressing better. Of course the fashion world did not help to “masculinize”
the straight man by creating androgynous apparels and accessories for men that
blurred the fashion demarcation between male and female.
The other thing is that, many of us will say that if you cross your legs while sitting down, you
look gayer especially if it’s a full cross or worse, a double cross. The
stereotypical male is not supposed to cross his leg and even if he does, he
only half-crosses where the lifted ankle is placed on the area just above the
knee. As for me, I don’t have this problem: I just can’t cross my legs because
of my big fat thighs are obstructing! I have been observing for a while now during
business meetings or even while I was eating at restaurants, I realized that
many men regardless gay or straight would cross their legs ever so often. So in
this modern world can we still say that the gays cross their legs more often than
the straights? How about those wearing long wispy hair, harem pants, skinny jeans and carrying
man-bags? Have the straight men become gayer while the gay men become more
straight?
|
Look mum! I have too huge thighs to do a full cross! (pic from www.wisegeek.com) |
I have this theory, about the evolution of the gay and
straight men. I think that during the early 70s, the gay men were split into
two evolutionary paths. For ease of explanation sake, I called the two paths,
MMG (more masculine gays) and MFG (more feminine gays). On the other hand, the
straight men also were split into two evolutionary paths, MMS (more masculine
straights) and MFS (more feminine straights). As time past, the MMG and MMS
became more and more manly while the MFG and MFS became more feminine.
Now fast-forward to 2013, which is around 40 years later,
the MFG and MFS began to merge thus blurring the so-called “gay” appearance of
a male. At the same time, the MMG has become manlier than the MFS. The MMG
don’t cross their legs, don’t carry man-bags, and don’t wear earrings while the
MFS will just do all that and probably even more! Hence, as some of the gays (MMG) behave and look more manly
than some of the straights (MFS), the definition of the “gay” look has evolved
significantly, and certainly debatable! In my personal opinion, I think it’s
more appropriate to categorise a look either by its feminine or masculine
traits and definitely not GAY per se.
Regardless
whether you are feminine or masculine, straight or gay, it doesn’t really
matter. What matters is don’t take these statements too seriously cause we will
not be able to change the world overnight. Just take it in good stride and be a
happier person. For it doesn’t matter whether you look gay or not, as long as
you are yourself and feeling good about it, that’s most important! So the next
time before you say, “that’s so gay” to another, pause a second because it may
be as gay as some of the straight behaves. This is Jimen signing out! Be happy
always! Cheers.
Nothing wrongs with gay nor lesbian. They are normal as straight.
ReplyDeleteYup call other people "so gay" make sense. People who are sensitive will get mad.
Wearing in style doesn't prove anything, we can just call them "Fashion".
SUPPORT you. :)
Thanks WayLee! Cheers
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome. Have a nice day. <3
ReplyDeleteInteresting post!
ReplyDeleteTo me it's definitely not right to call someone 'you look gay' 'or you're so gay', because there is a negative connotation behind such a remark. And I don't believe anyone use 'gay' to mean 'happy' anymore in this day and age, not in the context of 'you're so gay', anyway... So I don't believe you were too sensitive about it.
I think what is usually meant behind such a remark is 'you're so feminine', which again is also unkind, because like you said it doesn't matter whether one is feminine or masculine.
Thanks for your comments dude. As mentioned, I was not even the slightest upset over the his remark but more so that this incident made me think about the relevance of the usage in this modern world, and to me, it's no longer applicable. Cheers.
Delete